Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Noe v. Alabama Supreme Court

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division

February 26, 2015

WOODBURCK NOE, # 148475, Petitioner,
v.
ALABAMA SUPREME COURT, Respondent.

ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.

On February 9, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation that Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and his case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the requisite filing fee. (Doc. # 3.) On February 23, 2015, Petitioner Woodbruck Noe filed an Objection. (Doc. # 4.) The court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

In his objection, Mr. Noe argues that the interest of justice necessitates that a favorable judgment be entered on his behalf to preserve his First, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Mr. Noe's Objection is due to be overruled because he fails to address the Magistrate Judge's findings regarding his prior civil law suits and the application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)'s three-strike provision to his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Noe's Objection (Doc. # 4) is OVERRULED.

2. The Recommendation (Doc. # 3) is ADOPTED.

3. Mr. Noe's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DENIED, and his case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to pay the full filling fee upon the initiation of this case.

An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.