Ex parte D.E.; In re: D.E.
Jefferson County Department of Human Resources
Released for Publication August 5, 2015.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS. (Jefferson Juvenile Court, JU-07-84488.02, JU-07-84489.03, and JU-10-95200.01; Court of Civil Appeals, 2130461). Sandra H. Storm, Trial Judge.
For Petitioner: Patricia A. Gill, Birmingham.
STUART, Justice. Bolin, Shaw, Main, Wise, and Bryan, JJ., concur.
WRIT DENIED. NO OPINION.
MOORE, Chief Justice (dissenting).
On February 18, 2014, the Jefferson Juvenile Court terminated the parental rights of D.E. (" the mother" ) to three of her six children. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the juvenile court's judgment, without an opinion. D.E. v. Jefferson Cnty. Dep't of Human Res. (No. 2130461, September 19, 2014), __ So.3d __(Ala.Civ.App. 2014)(table). This Court today denies the mother's petition for a writ of certiorari. I dissent from that denial because there appears to be no clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of her parental rights. The mother has never abused her children and seems to have taken great measures to support them to the best of her ability.
The juvenile court placed undue weight on the fact that the mother was previously in an abusive relationship with the children's father. The mother alleges that she has not seen the father since February 2012, when he appeared at her place of employment. The children have not communicated with or seen the father since March 2010, and there is no indication that he ever abused them. The mother claims that she is unaware of the father's whereabouts, that she does not have his contact information, and that she does not communicate with his relatives.
The evidence before the juvenile court showed that the mother's housing was stable and that she had two bedrooms, four beds for the children, and ample furniture. At the time of the hearing she was employed as a sitter for the elderly at a hospital and had maintained continual employment with various employers for the year and a half preceding the hearing. Although the children had been removed from the mother's custody at some point before the hearing, the mother consistently visited the children and talked with them regularly by telephone. She provided the children with clothes and cash, among other things. The social worker assigned to the mother's case from October 2011 through February 2013 testified
that the mother was cooperative and that she had ...